Friday, June 4, 2010

Final Socratic Seminar

What role should the U.S. play on the World's stage after World War II?

After World War II the U.S. had a lot of choices about foreign policy. They could impose a Pax Americana which means they want control over the soviets. Or they could Contain soviet communism which means that the U.S. Wants to keep Soviet land separate from others. Or Co-exist and compromise which means that the Soviets and the Americans will compromise and share ideas and be lenient about it. Or avoid foreign entanglements, which means that the Americans can return to "making their lives better without foreign threats lurking over their shoulders." I think that these four policies are beneficial to the U.S. but I think that I agree with number three: Co-exist and compromise.

One of the reasons I believe in this is because Democracy is important to have. Democracy is basically equality and freedom for the people. I think that democracy can not be forced on others because it’s their own beliefs. If we can’t force it then we might suggest these rules on others. We can show it as a model and if they want to choose to listen and agree with it they can but if not they wont. This gives other countries equality and freedom to choose their own beliefs.

The ideas of equality and freedom come from the grate philosopher John Locke. He believed in Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Property. He thinks that everyone should have the ability to get these policies not just one person but everyone. Unlike like Locke, Hobbies believe that to have protection you have to give up freedom to those in power. The Soviet Union followed Hobbes’ idea because they gave up there freedom to the communists party in order to get protection. The U.S. is based on Locke’s ideas because the declaration of independence uses these rules and follows them. These two ideas make a conflict between the U.S. and the soviets.

To understand the conflicts we have to look at World War I and II. We entered these wars because there were conflicts between two nations. In WWI we got involved because the Germans had sunk the Lusitania, was a luxury cruise ship. The Americans were on the ship so the U.S. felt like it was an attack on them. Then in WWII we got involved because Japan had dropped bombs on Pearl Harbor. They attack the navy base in order to swipe out there powers. But in fact the U.S. came over and showed them there true powers.

By showing our powers in WWII the U.S. became together with other countries. The U.S. is the main leader in the world. This helped create the conflicts with the Soviets. This is because both of the U.S. and the soviets played a role in this war and after words they would both wanted different outcomes over the war. In order to move forward they should Co- Exist and compromise.

8 comments:

  1. "The ideas of equality and freedom come from the grate philosopher John Locke. He believed in Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Property. He thinks that everyone should have the ability to get these policies not just one person but everyone. Unlike like Locke, Hobbies believe that to have protection you have to give up freedom to those in power. The Soviet Union followed Hobbes’ idea because they gave up there freedom to the communists party in order to get protection. The U.S. is based on Locke’s ideas because the declaration of independence uses these rules and follows them. These two ideas make a conflict between the U.S. and the soviets"

    I like this whole paragraph and hoe you explain the two points of views of the both philosophers. I would strongly agree with John Locke and how hes all about everyone having their freedom and not having to be controlled buy someone. and also that is something that the U.S and Soviets would argue about because here in the U.S. its all based on Lockes ideas and in the Soviets are based under Hobbes ideas.

    good job by the wayy

    ReplyDelete
  2. I dont agree when you said Co-exist and compromise cause I choose isolationist because I think we shouldnt get involved in the war if were not in part of it already and we should only fight back if someone did something to us.

    ReplyDelete
  3. i agree in the one that about democracy is true we should have the right to speak or say what are we thinking and not let some one all ales tell us what we need to do and is not fair but i like that way so said that we should not be forced or force others if they don't one too

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am going to be very critical, I must warn you. Your ideas and beliefs are very vague and dry. Plus, your grammar and spelling is (in my opinion) poorly done.

    But there is some intelligent statements within your paragraphs, I must admit. You state that in your belief's the United States should not force democracy onto other nations. In some countries democracy does not work, in others it does. Same with communism.

    But don't back up your belief that the United States and the Soviet Union should co-exist in harmony. What you don't say is how, or why. If I were you, I would express more on that.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lulusaur!! said...

    Thank you lulu this really helps me out. I think that is awesome that you agree with me. The way you say that the U.S. and the Soviets would argue about the point.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Adrian said...

    Thank you Adrian for giving me an eye opener to another point of view. I would have never looked at it in the other way if you hadn't showed it. I want to say that I still don't agree with what you said but I will respect your opinions.

    ReplyDelete
  7. lucezita said...

    Thanks for agreeing with me Luz. I totally get what your saying about people need to speak about your own mind.

    ReplyDelete
  8. alex avalos said...

    Thank you for informing me that i need to check my spelling and be more descriptive. I see now what your saying that it is very dry and vague. also how i need to give evidence. Thanks again.

    ReplyDelete